Daniel Masur vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Masur vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Masur vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Masur 1 - 1 Ilkel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Masur has won 52.06% of points on their second serve, while Ilkel has won 46.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Masur, in recent form, has won 51.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.21% and 25.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Masur has saved 64.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 51.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Masur has won 67.14% of matches played (W/L 47/ 23), with Ilkel winning 40% (W/L 20/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Masur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 134/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/ 10), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Masur winning 1 times and Ilkel being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Masur winning 3 and Ilkel winning 2. The last match between Masur and Ilkel was at the Rome 2 Challenger, 27-04-2021, First, Clay with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 4-6 6-4 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Masur and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Masur winning 0 times and Ilkel 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Masur winning 0, and Ilkel 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Masur has played against opponents with an average rank of 198.31 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 224.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Masur has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Masur has converted 44.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 40.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
15
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
295
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
412
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
58% (384-279)
Career Total W/L
56% (401-313)
78% (32-9)
YTD W/L
39% (9-14)
$151,200
Career Prize Money
$225,530
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daniel Masur | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
Games Won | 28 | 24 |
Aces (Total) | 14 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:46 | 1:55:46 |
1st Serve % | 64% (95/148) | 66% (120/182) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (68/95) | 57% (69/120) |
2nd Serve Win% | 43% (23/53) | 53% (33/62) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (9/16) | 54% (7/13) |
Return Points W% | 44% (80/182) | 39% (57/148) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-4 7-6(2) |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Daniel Masur
65%
(
84 of
129)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
59 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
115
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
6-3 6-4 |
Daniel Masur
Player
Cem Ilkel
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Masur | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 78% (32/9) | 39% (9/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 74% (70/25) | 39% (20/31) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (538/401) | 45% (208/257) |
Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 33% (4/8) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 85% (28/5) | 45% (5/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.5 |
Aces Total | 222 | 113 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.23 |
DFs Total | 106 | 51 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:19 | 1:29:54 |
Avg Opp Rank | 178 | 171.04 |
1st Serve % | 65% (1858/2853) | 57% (805/1413) |
1st Serve W% | 76% (1406/1858) | 70% (566/805) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (518/995) | 47% (284/608) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (131/296) | 40% (38/94) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (1180/2978) | 36% (479/1345) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 82% (9/2) | 47% (7/8) |
Futures W/L | 79% (23/6) | 29% (2/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (32/41) | 36% (8/22) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (12/18) | 83% (5/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 88% (34/30) | 70% (10/7) |
1st set W, L | 12% (34/4) | 30% (10/3) |
1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 15% (13/2) |
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Masur
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Masur
Player
Lucas Gerch
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Masur
Player
Vilius Gaubas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Masur
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
111)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Masur
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Masur
Player
Theo Papamalamis
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more